Crashed Pips - Computers, politics, emetic trash

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

My password is not ‘password’

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 17:17

Some people are so stupid with passwords, it would seem, that they might as well erect a sign outside their door saying “LOOK! BANK ACCOUNTS, ONLINE PROFILES, PRIVATE INFORMATION, ALL FOR FREE!”

Malicious hackers know that a lot of computer users find it difficult to remember passwords, and will therefore choose something they won’t forget and will stick with for a long time. Easy passwords like ‘password’ or ‘open’ or ’security’ are a no-brainer, for both unsuspecting user and evil cracker.

Equally unpreferable are ‘dictionary’ passwords, as in single words like ‘cabbage’. When picking a password, if you absolutely must make it a single word, pick up a dictionary (yes, the big heavy one) and look for it. Ideally you might also want to search the full Oxford English Dictionary if your library has a copy, or check on Wiktionary. If a dictionary password is used, all the cracker has to do is try all the words in the dictionary and he’s in.

Obvious numbers are also a big no-no. Don’t use your date of birth, phone number or the box you won Deal or No Deal with. Neither should you use your username, and definitely don’t use a blank password. This allowed the British hacker Gary McKinnon to enter NASA’s systems and then make wild, ridiculous claims about UFOs and free energy.

The best policy for generating passwords is to put something in at random, a combination of letters, numbers, and preferably some symbols like # ~ @ etc. It should be at least eight characters long, and changed at least every year, preferably every three months.

And writing passwords down should be avoided whenever possible. If you need to write down your home password, then keep it under lock and key (eg in a safe). NEVER write down your business password.

You may think I’m being a bit over-the-top in this, but it is incredibly important in these days when identity theft is widespread and as easy as rummaging around in someone’s bins. And I can’t imagine your boss being very happy if he finds out that a rival company employed someone to crack your weak password and steal a document called StrategiesForAdvantageAgainstCompetition.docx. Both identity theft and corporate espionage are big business and on the Internet, there are people who will do anything to make a few quid.



Monday, March 19, 2007

Hackers and Crackers - what’s the difference?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 12:57

Journalists have, since computers and the Internet have been around, talking about the evils of ‘hackers’, and how they can get into your computer and steal your data and then sell it on to a scammer.

Well, not always. The term hacker is a very broad term - it defines anyone who either

  1. modifies a device or program to suit their own ends
  2. gains access to a computer by working around security measures.

So, let’s dispel some of the myths about hacking in the second sense, which is what this article concentrates on and journalists generally define hacking as.

Number one: hackers are people who write viruses. Well, technically they don’t. They may write them as an experiment to check the security of a system, or as an evil attempt to take over the Internet. But people who do the latter are technically called virus writers.

Number two: hackers always have malicious intentions. Not necessarily - most hackers are either

  1. employed by a company to test the security of their computer system and network,
  2. acting in good faith, attempting to warn users or companies about insecurities in their system,
  3. attempting to create the ultimate, one-size-fits-all killer security solution.

Some hackers are even employed by the police to hack into criminals’ security systems, or to help educate people on the risks of leaving their computers open to attack. These are called ‘ethical hackers’.

Technically, people whom the media brand simply ‘hackers’ should be branded as malicious hackers or crackers.



Powered by WordPress 2.7 Comments are the responsibility of their respective author. The Rest © 2007-2009 Jonathan Rothwell, unless otherwise stated.