Crashed Pips - Computers, politics, emetic trash

Thursday, May 17, 2007

I’d love to go open-source, but the logo is putting me off

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , , , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 20:41

There was a discussion some while ago on Slashdot about how some people refuse to use open-source software because of the strange program titles. Indeed, there has been a trend in recent years of software projects like GNOME renaming subsidiary programs from sensible, understandable titles (for example, GNOME Softphone) to what appears to be the result of some developer banging their fingers on the keyboard in a random pattern. In this case, GNOME Softphone became Egika.

The old rule “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” seems not to apply to the strange world of GNOME.

Occasionally, an odd name can work well - like Ubuntu Linux - the name is memorable and meaningful. However, if everyone starts calling their programs names like “Unedacista” (just made that word up off the top of my head) or other bizarre, pointless names, it’ll just make people think the open source crowd are a bunch of loonies who are out there to confuse people.

One other thing that I would add is that there seem to be some really dreadful logos for open-source projects out there - some are boring, some are tacky, some are just plain naff.

 

 Debian’s logo has a nice idea, but the pink colour scheme is horrible and it needs to be a little more tarted up in my opinion.

The Arch Linux logo - again, nice idea, but poor execution. The matted effect just makes it look like a malfunctioning jelly bean.

Whoever had the idea to have a foot as GNOME’s logo should be shot. I mean, what does the foot tell you? That GNOME is smelly, cheesy, and occasionally suffers from athlete’s foot?

There are plenty of branding agencies out there who would be more than happy to help - if you happened to have a quarter of a million pounds on your hands. (I hear that a particularly good agency is Martin Lambie-Nairn, who are responsible for some of the most famous logos/brands ever.)

But then again, you could always try again.

Or make do.

Just don’t bang your head on the keyboard when you need to think of a name for your next big coding project, think ‘that’ll do’ and make do.



Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Fun with TFTs

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 18:23

I’ve been using a second-hand 15″ TFT monitor for just under two months now, and today came into a large, 17″ Medion SXGA screen. And my goodness, does it do the job well. I’m typing this now at a 1280*1024 pixels screen resolution, and the text is crystal clear, sharp and well-defined.

But it wasn’t at first. It was, when first plugged in, fuzzy, out of focus, cutting off around a tenth of the picture and had washed-out colours. And many people when buying a TFT for the first time probably don’t understand the reason for this.

There is a reason - it’s because the monitor is below its native resolution. The native resolution is the minimum screen resolution the screen can work with without the image appearing blocky or fuzzy. Normally it’s the highest resolution the monitor is capable of as well.

If your monitor appears mysteriously fuzzy, it’s because the screen resolution is set below the native resolution. You need to compensate for this by increasing the screen resolution.

In Windows, this is relatively simple (for something that Microsoft wrote not too long ago - my goodness…) - all you have to do is go to the Display Properties dialogue box (right click the desktop, select Properties), switch to the Settings tab, and drag the ’screen resolution’ slider as far to the right as it will go.

Resetting the Screen Resolution in Windows screenshot

Now click the ‘Apply’ button and wait. The screen may blank or flicker for a few seconds, but don’t scream and pull your hair out - this is only because the computer and monitor are adjusting themselves to the new settings.

Then, when your desktop reappears, if it does, click the “Yes” button within fifteen seconds - otherwise the machine will revert to the old resolution.

In Linux, if you’re not using a desktop environment that has an applet to control screen resolution, like the one in KDE and another in GNOME, you’ll probably need to edit the x.org configuration file - see your distribution’s documentation for information about how to do this.

Things to bear in mind

Note that you need to be careful when picking resolutions, in particular when it comes to the screen’s aspect ratio. Normal, non-widescreen monitors use the aspect ratio 4:3 (four pixels across to three pixels down). Widescreen monitors use roughly a 16:9 or 16:10 ratio. If you pick the wrong ratio for your screen, it’ll make the image appear squashed and probably break your screen as well.

There’s a simple way to work out the aspect ratio of a resolution - use a scientific calculator to simplify the fraction of the first number over the second number, eg 1280 over 1024. You could also simplify it by hand if you wanted.



Google. Now with themes.

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 18:20

I’m a huge Google fan. It’s simple, fast, and sooo much better than Microsoft in so many places. And now it’s acquired one crucial element that’ll help its Personalised Homepage service appeal to more people - the ability to change the style. And these new styles aren’t just dumb CSS scripts - they analyse the time and weather conditions in your location, and then apply the correct style sheet as necessary.

And the best thing about it is that it doesn’t impede Google’s trademark simplicity. Since its first day on Stanford University’s server as Backrub, it’s been simple and to the point. These themes retain that simplicity, adding a touch of colour and charm to them. So kudos to Google for that…



Powered by WordPress 2.7 Comments are the responsibility of their respective author. The Rest © 2007-2009 Jonathan Rothwell, unless otherwise stated.