Crashed Pips - Computers, politics, emetic trash

Friday, December 12, 2008

WordPress is how open-source software should be done

Filed under: Software — Tags: , , , , , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 19:15
The new WordPress dashboard, i.e. the secret control panel of this site

The new WordPress dashboard, i.e. the secret control panel of this site

I love WordPress. I’ve used lots of blogging software, but WordPress has always been my favourite. It’s easy to install, simple, customisable down to the bone, extensible, hassle-free, lightweight, and the fact that all this is free and open-source is a true gift. I find it very difficult to fault it.

With the recent 2.7 release, there’s a new dashboard which fully takes into account research (done by proper research people) on where people look and how intuitively they perceive things. It is now so simple to operate the software that my mum could do it blindfolded. (Well, I haven’t tested that particular theory, but… it’s assumed.)

There’s more things that make WordPress utterly brilliant: it’s got a massive and thriving community around it, and there are even community ‘celebrities’ such as Lorelle VanFossen, whose fame blossomed after becoming involved in WordPress. These people will help you if you do run into issues (although I’ve never - if I remember correctly - had to ask for help, setting things up and getting them running is so damn easy.)

WordPress is also used by famous people. The New York Times, Top Gear, CNN, Martha Stewart, Stephen Fry - these are just some of the people who’ve used WordPress in applications that can sometimes be called ‘industrial’. It’s fabulous.

However, perhaps the most important thing is that I have never run across a WordPress ‘zealot’. I’ve never found a WordPress user who will insult a person for not using the same software as him. Indeed, Six Apart (the people who make Movable Type, WordPress’s main [proprietary] competitor) have been forced to resort to FUD in the past (something about not all of WordPress being open source - which it is - IIRC) and the responses from the WordPress community seem to consist only of honest and valid criticism. No pseudo-”Window$” or “Winblows” nonsense.

If only all FLOSS was like WordPress.



Tuesday, November 4, 2008

THIS is what Fedora 10’s boot sequence will look like

Filed under: Linux — Tags: , , , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 00:17


I must admit, when I first saw this, I was floored. It is staggeringly beautiful.

It uses a new bootsplash system called Plymouth, which takes advantage of the modesetting abilities available in some kernels. Hopefully modesetting will make it into the next release of the mainline kernel so that Plymouth can be used more easily on other distributions: whilst it requires compilation into the initramfs, it looks gorgeous and will certainly increase the ‘wow’ factor for Fedora.



Friday, October 31, 2008

OMG! It’s KDE!

Filed under: Linux — Tags: , , , , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 17:54

A pretty desktop! On KDE4! OMGWTFBBQ!

A pretty desktop! On KDE4! OMGWTFBBQ!

I never thought I’d be saying this. This is a KDE4 desktop: or, more specifically, it’s my KDE desktop.

It’s quite a surprise - Ubuntu’s famed for its rather rubbish implementation of KDE. However, the installation went quite smoothly on the Eee PC (if a bit buggily) and after a reboot and a little tweaking, everything worked wonderfully.

There are one or two rough edges. I don’t like the size of the Kickoff menu, and I also think that more work is needed on Firefox integration. KMail is also obnoxious towards Gmail’s IMAP server. However, I’ll be sticking with KDE on Kubuntu 8.10 - for now at least. I’m impressed by KDE 4.1: while it’s still not perfect, it’s better than the original KDE4 release by an order of magnitude. It’s also quite a lot speedier (although not as fast as GNOME).

I hate to say it, but I may have to eat my words about KDE. The way it is, it has a lot going for it.



Friday, August 17, 2007

‘All Firefox users are content thieves’ - WTF?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 20:42

A collective “WTF?” on Slashdot is a common thing - the RIAA going after a 10-year-old girl, Microsoft’s updates doing nothing more than updating the registry descriptors - but now it seems that anyone who uses Firefox is a content thief. Well, according to a certain right-wing capitalist numpty. More information here - I may attempt an investigation and find out if any of these claims are true (which I highly doubt) and if the author has any kind of credibility.

(That’ll be two investigative journalism items in one week - and it’s not even your birthday!)



Thursday, May 17, 2007

I’d love to go open-source, but the logo is putting me off

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , , , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 20:41

There was a discussion some while ago on Slashdot about how some people refuse to use open-source software because of the strange program titles. Indeed, there has been a trend in recent years of software projects like GNOME renaming subsidiary programs from sensible, understandable titles (for example, GNOME Softphone) to what appears to be the result of some developer banging their fingers on the keyboard in a random pattern. In this case, GNOME Softphone became Egika.

The old rule “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” seems not to apply to the strange world of GNOME.

Occasionally, an odd name can work well - like Ubuntu Linux - the name is memorable and meaningful. However, if everyone starts calling their programs names like “Unedacista” (just made that word up off the top of my head) or other bizarre, pointless names, it’ll just make people think the open source crowd are a bunch of loonies who are out there to confuse people.

One other thing that I would add is that there seem to be some really dreadful logos for open-source projects out there - some are boring, some are tacky, some are just plain naff.

 

 Debian’s logo has a nice idea, but the pink colour scheme is horrible and it needs to be a little more tarted up in my opinion.

The Arch Linux logo - again, nice idea, but poor execution. The matted effect just makes it look like a malfunctioning jelly bean.

Whoever had the idea to have a foot as GNOME’s logo should be shot. I mean, what does the foot tell you? That GNOME is smelly, cheesy, and occasionally suffers from athlete’s foot?

There are plenty of branding agencies out there who would be more than happy to help - if you happened to have a quarter of a million pounds on your hands. (I hear that a particularly good agency is Martin Lambie-Nairn, who are responsible for some of the most famous logos/brands ever.)

But then again, you could always try again.

Or make do.

Just don’t bang your head on the keyboard when you need to think of a name for your next big coding project, think ‘that’ll do’ and make do.



Monday, March 19, 2007

Ubuntu Fiesty Fawn, Herd 5

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 11:06

THE best version of Ubuntu ever… well, so far, at least.

And it does have its faults. For example, the default Live CD installer is slow, cumbersome and crashed when I tried to install it. I do hope they sort this out when the final version of Fiesty comes out.

Then there’s the artwork - a horrible, grey, milk-chocolate coloured wallpaper is the default, and the login splash screen is similar. They don’t even closely resemble skin tones, and in my opinion the orange and caramel colours in the windows look much better. I hope this is sorted by the final release.

But now we turn to the positve parts of Feisty Fawn - such as the no-longer-terrifying boot screen. Basically it shows a glowing, glossy Ubuntu logo, and one of those lovely orange progress meters beneath it. Instead of the terrifying (to a Linux newbie) text scrolling underneath that used to accompany booting.

But the system sounds are annoying - I installed 7.04 over the outdated 5.10, which had one of the best startup jingles ever. The new sounds (started in 6.10?) aren’t bad, but they just lack something that the previous set had. But at least it beats Windows’s set.

I do like the new applications, ie Tomboy, Disk Usage analyser etc. And also, the big advantage of this new version is its SPEED! It boots within thirty seconds, around half the time of the old 5.10 release. That’s a very nice surprise, as normally an OS would get slower on the same hardware in later versions. Closedown also happens remarkably quickly, as no more than twenty seconds pass between my hitting the “Shut Down” button and the machine powering off.

So, while Ubuntu 7.04 does have its faults, it’s the first version of Ubuntu I’d be truly happy to install on my computer in place of Windows.

Well, if they had drivers for my WLAN adapter and printer I would…



Powered by WordPress 2.7 Comments are the responsibility of their respective author. The Rest © 2007-2009 Jonathan Rothwell, unless otherwise stated.