So, while it’s good enough for Labour to invade Iraq, why not the authoritative military reigime of Burma (currently killing those who dare to speak out against it) or the selfish, greedy Mugabean reigime of Zimbabwe, currently strangling its citizens with inflation at 5000% per year, meaning prices go up in the queues?
I personally think that Iraq should have been invaded and Saddam should have been toppled, but with a lot more planning. The British were in a way led (or misled) into war like George Bush’s poodle.
And still, the Zimbabweans and Burmese need assistance (it’s hard to run a revolution or a coup d’etat without any outside help). But we can’t. Why? Because of the mess Bush and the Bliar got us into, our troops are currently fighting a losing battle down to the last man standing in the Middle East, leaving other violent communist reigimes to effectively repeat the Tianemen Square massacre of 1989.
