Crashed Pips - Computers, politics, emetic trash

Saturday, December 27, 2008

Andrew Burnham: Clueless

 

The Hon. Andrew Burnham, courtesy of 2-5 Media GbR

The Hon. Andrew Burnham, courtesy of 2-5 Media GbR

Andrew Burnham, the Minister for Culture (sorry, Culture Secretary - what exactly is his job?) has said in an interview with the Telegraph that cinema-style age ratings for Web sites are ‘an option’.

In an interview with The Daily Telegraph, Andy Burnham says he believes that new standards of decency need to be applied to the web. He is planning to negotiate with Barack Obama’s incoming American administration to draw up new international rules for English language websites.

The Cabinet minister describes the internet as “quite a dangerous place” and says he wants internet-service providers (ISPs) to offer parents “child-safe” web services.

Giving film-style ratings to individual websites is one of the options being considered, he confirms. When asked directly whether age ratings could be introduced, Mr Burnham replies: “Yes, that would be an option. This is an area that is really now coming into full focus.”

Compelete and utter nonsense. It’s totally unworkable.

Firstly, let’s remember the original goals of the Internet and the World Wide Web. The whole point was to create a medium where anyone could freely express himself, and be out of the reach of governments and censorship. This idea undermines the whole principle of ‘net neutrality’ on which the Web was founded.

Moreover, let’s not forget that filters are used all the time: and there are always ways to circumvent them. Just ask any twelve-year-old how they access Bebo during their ICT lessons: proxies are available and for every website blocked, another mirror or identical proxy will spring up somewhere else.

What Mr. Burnham appears not to understand is that the Internet is very much decentralised. Any computer can host a Web site with the right software installed, and when that’s connected to the Web, it can be accessed from any machine in the world. Mr. Burnham’s understanding of the Internet appears to be like a spider: with all information in the centre and clients all outside. It does not work like that.

It worries me that the Government is getting more heavy-handed with regards to the Internet, and, for once, even it’s now becoming worthwhile to host one’s Web site outside the UK. Guido Fawkes’s blog is moving to a host outside Great Britain, because, in his words, ‘Google UK likes to please governments.’ Even the Daily Mail (and most of its commentators!) agree that the whole idea is barmy.

Tom Watson MP, a Labour MP and cabinet minister who does understand technology, is inviting the public’s opinion on his Web site, which he will forward on to Burnham. It might be worth heading over there and giving your opinions on this cretinous proposal.



Saturday, December 13, 2008

Do we all need ’slogans’ now?

Filed under: Communications, Internet, Web 2.0 — Tags: , , , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 15:44

Is it just me, or does this whole Web 2.0 thing seem to be turning into a bit of a marketing-fest? It seems to me that everyone’s primary goal on the New Web (which is really how the Old Web was meant to be) is to have as big a presence and following as possible.

I have this blog, a Twitter account, a Delicious account, another, more ‘traditional’ web site at jonathan-rothwell.co.uk and I post to a couple of internet forums. However, social media ’superstars’ like iJustine and Chris Pirillo seem to be more omniescent than Starbucks. (In Pirillo’s case, you can even spy on him, 24/7, using the live stream. Making life easier for stalkers? Never let it be said.)

I don’t have any objection to this: in fact, I relish it. The fact that people can become celebrities over the Internet is one of the best aspects of it: it truly is the common man’s own expression medium. However… that said…

We also have people telling us how to become successful on the net. Apparently, we need to ‘market ourselves’ and build up a ‘personal brand’. Really? Does this mean every Internet user needs a marketing suite, similar to those supplied by the likes of AMV BBDO, Wolf Ollins and Martin Lambie-Nairn to corporations for hundreds of thousands of pounds?

Does this mean we should all have a corporate colour scheme? A jingle? A logo? Slogans?

How about these, then?

  • Jonathan Rothwell: destroying badly built PCs since 1992.
  • Crashed Pips: The world’s easiest demotivator.
  • Crashed Pips: Oh. My. God.
  • Jonathan Rothwell: Ever been to Thorpe Park? Remember Nemesis? He’s worse than Nemesis.
  • 97% of readers rated Crashed Pips more coherent than Norma Major’s latest book.
  • Crashed Pips: it might be crap, but at least it’s free. (i.e. you don’t get paid if it damages you emotionally.)

In theory, if we are to believe the SM marketing types, now I’ve put these slogans up here, people will come flooding to this website in such numbers that I’ll have to take up prostitution as a full-time job in order to pay for the bandwidth.

I somehow doubt it. Heavily.



Wednesday, June 11, 2008

WWDC ‘08 Stevenote Post Mortem

Filed under: Apple, Macintosh — Tags: , , , , , , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 18:40

If you’ll recall, a couple of days ago, I wrote about what I expected would appear at WWDC ‘08. As it transpires, it was a rather surprising event.

  • The iPhone: This made up the bulk of the Stevenote, where Steve Jobs was also (unusually) assisted by Scott Forstall and Phil Schiller. The 2.0 firmware is almost complete and will appear next month - I was surprised it wasn’t complete by now, but I suppose they’re just being careful with a few final sweeps for bugs. The actual revised iPhone wasn’t surprising from a hardware perspective: 3G, lower price, GPS, similar case design… but I was surprised that the case is now almost all plastic instead of all aluminium. The new feature list is somewhat disappointing, although thanks to the iPhone’s nature it shouldn’t be too long to see a change to this. O2 are also going to offer it on a pay-as-you-go tariff, for an unconfirmed price. However, I can’t take much credit for this. The 3G iPhone was the worst-kept secret in history.
  • Mysteriously, the rumoured new MacBooks didn’t appear. This was surprising, although the amount of iPhone stuff they got through probably restricted what else they could get in the keynote.
  • Mac OS X 10.6 was announced - it’s called Snow Leopard, and not Cougar as I expected. I was right in that it’ll concentrate on polish and performance; however, it’s hard to see Apple resisting the temptation to shoehorn a few new features in, including a few aesthetic changes. However, it was only mentioned briefly in the keynote.
  • The Mac Mini and Blu-Ray SuperDrives were not mentioned, which is also quite surprising, particularly for the former. Said machine hasn’t been revised for around a year now, indicating a revamp of the line may be imminent. I suspect both the Mini and new MacBooks (if any) will appear at a similar event to the event the revised iMac appeared last year, so at this rate we could be looking at August.
  • MobileMe (a new synchronisation service which also features .Mac’s old functionalities) wasn’t much of a surprise: it would have been insane for Apple to build in the push PIM, synchronisation, remote kill, etc if it could only be used by enterprises with Microsoft Exchange. I also like the idea of being able to sync my Eee, my iMac, and my phone’s address book, although whether or not it likes Linux is another matter. I suspect it will.

Overall, the Stevenote was something of a disappointment. It was interesting to see what they had to show us, but it concentrated heavily on the iPhone. This is very surprising.



Saturday, June 7, 2008

iPredict for WWDC…

Filed under: Apple, Communications, Macintosh, iPredictions — Tags: , , , , , , , , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 12:13

The infamous iHype has been steadily growing in anticipation of Steve Jobs’s keynote on Monday at WWDC.

The Macworld offices are, evidently, very busy, with new rumours coming in left, right and centre. And this is not to mention the Apple rumour sites, whose editors must, judging by the number of rumours we’re seeing, be on forty caffiene tablets an hour.

Rumors include a tablet Mac, larger iPhones with 3G and GPS, 14-inch MacBooks with aluminium casing, and all manner of other goodies.

I have slightly different predictions:

  • It is almost certain we will see a 3G iPhone, although I suspect the case design will remain largely unchanged. We’ll see, at most, an all aluminium and glass design - I severely doubt the authenticity of the iPhone with white plastic casing. We’ll see voice dialing, a revised home button which glows different colours when SMSes, MMSes, etc are received, 802.11n, and the actual launch of the 2.0 firmware and the App Store. O2 will also offer the iPhone on a pay-as-you-go plan in the UK, charging 11p a minute for each call and SMS, and offering free Internet access (3G, GPRS, EDGE and Wi-Fi with The Cloud).
  • I suspect we may see new MacBooks and MacBook Pros next week. Both devices will be made completely out of aluminium, and the MacBook Pro will take on a more ‘brushed metal’ appearance, similar to the iMac. The MacBook will have a black surround around the screen, also similar to the iMac.
  • The first features of Mac OS X 10.6 will be revealed. It’ll be called Cougar, and will focus heavily on polish and reliability. One of the most immediately obvious features is Fairy Dust, a new set of graphical transitions that occur when a window is minimised, an icon is undocked, etc. This will mean that the Genie effect is revised, and now causes the window to ’sink’ as well as warp into the Dock, and that when the Trash is emptied, the Trashcan will glow and the items inside will appear to explode. Cougar will also include a new Terminal, which allows users to switch, using a menu, between the Bourne shell, the Korn shell, bash, dash, csh, tcsh, and a new, Apple designed shell called crash (Completely Redesigned Apple SHell). It’ll also have native support for ZFS and ext2/3/4. The new graphical enhancements will give Cougar the slogan ‘everything that happens is a blockbuster’, and therefore the new intro movie will reflect that fact, flying around a maze of historic Macintosh models while Ed Welch’s theme tune to Blockbusters plays in the background - additionally, the new intro movie will reveal that OS X has finally been translated into Welsh.
  • ‘One More Thing’ will be a new revision of the Mac Mini. It will include an all aluminium design, and will also have FireWire 800 on board, 802.11n, a SuperDrive, keyboard and mouse as standard, and a $200 discount off a 20″ Cinema Display.
  • There will be one more iddy-biddy thing: there’ll be Blu-Ray SuperDrives for Macs, which can be ordered separately and installed by hand, or added as a build configuration option for an extra $300-ish.
Even if I am entirely wrong, it’ll be very interesting to see what is revealed on Monday. Now I just need to work out what time the keynote starts, and what time it’ll be in London when that happens.



Friday, February 1, 2008

Review: the 3 Skypephone

Filed under: Communications, Reviews — Tags: , , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 22:30

Skypephone

As I’ve said before, I’ve switched my mobile provider from Tesco Mobile to 3, and bought a new phone in the process. It’s the 3 Skypephone. I shan’t review the network here: that is another tale for another day. I shall write about it next week. Now, I shall simply review the phone.

I bought it from a 3 store (in fact, a sublet of a branch of Superdrug). I was served by a very nice gentleman, who kindly reminded me that I needed to top up by £10 a month to keep the Skype minutes active, and was very helpful in serving me with the phone. He even gave me a penny’s extra change out of the two twenties and one ten pound note that I paid him with: he said he didn’t have a single penny. That was nice.

The phone’s packaging was very easy to open, and well-thought out. The phone itself is quite small, and is very nice-looking. It has a glossy finish, and also has quite tough casing.

I’m divided about the magnetic back cover. It’s easy to get off, but it doesn’t exactly lend itself to being sturdy. I haven’t had too much of a problem with it: it’s certainly given me less trouble than the Nokia 5200’s cover.

The pesky cover for the USB port soon came off (yay!) so that minor, and pointless, irritation has been removed. I noticed that as the USB port is in a recess in the bottom of the phone, it’s very unlikely that dirt will clog it up.

I’m a little concerned that the USB port is the only port on the machine. It means I can’t have the headset in while the phone’s charging, or while it’s connected as a USB mass storage device (although Bluetooth pretty much eliminates that need).

Niggles out of the way, I like the interface. It takes a lot of getting used to, but otherwise it’s quite good: it is very Sendo-esque. I like the fact that the Menu key is its own separate key.

The phone is also capable of multi-tasking. By pressing a button on the side, you can activate the task switcher. It can be activated by accident, but that’s only a minor inconvenience.

More annoying is the ‘click’ sound that the phone makes when its keys are pressed: it also makes this noise when the phone is locked, so if you bend down it can sound like there’s a Geiger counter going off in your pocket.

Also slightly pointless is the video-calling feature: whilst it does offer the facility, there is no forward-facing camera. This means either you can’t see your caller, they can’t see you, or you have to carry out the call in front of a mirror.

On the other hand, all the basic functions are there: call quality is good, text messaging is good, Skype is very clear, and WAP access over 3G is very fast. While the phone doesn’t support SkypeIn, SkypeOut or Skype Voicemail, and for some reason Google Maps cell tower triangulation doesn’t work (yet), the basic functions all work. And they all work well.

Don’t be deceived by the 2-megapixel camera. It’s rather rubbish in quality at 2MP, but it’s adequate enough for video calling.

I also dislike that the standby screen can’t be customised: you’re stuck with the keys for the Launcher and Planet 3. It’s not too big of an issue, but it’s something for future development.

Overall, the phone is quite good. It does get the feeling of being slightly unfinished, but I’m sure these will be sorted out with software updates. I highly recommend it as a general-purpose phone with plenty of functions: and at £49.99 (or £49.98 in my case) it is excellent value.



IT WORKS!

Filed under: Communications — Tags: , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 20:48

The Skypephone I bought last Friday is now fully working, the number has been transferred over. Trying to go through its functions now, while trying to get into my Nokia 5200 to destroy the old SIM card.



Sunday, January 27, 2008

I’ve got the 3 Skypephone…

Filed under: Communications — Tags: , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 14:50

I’ve recently acquired a 3 Skypephone. I shall refrain from reviewing it until Friday, when my account gets credited and my number is transferred to the new network. In the meantime, suffice to say: it’s good.



Sunday, December 9, 2007

Review: Nokia 5200

Filed under: Communications, Reviews — Tags: , , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 16:53

Nokia 5200My old mobile phone, a Motorola V220, was becoming increasingly incontinent, sucking up battery life as if it was going out of fashion. So, in the time-honoured tradition, I replaced it yesterday.

The phone chosen to replace it was the Nokia 5200 with blue casing. The casing is white, with the coloured part shot in rubber. It is quite durable from what I’ve seen.

(more…)



AQA 63336 - ANY question answered?

Filed under: Communications, Humour, Reviews — Tags: , , , , , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 13:56

I came across AQA 63336 a few days ago, a service which allows you to obtain the answer to almost any question with £1 and a phone capable of sending SMS messages.

Intrigued by the service, I decided to test it. I had originally been led to the site thanks to Simon Howard mentioning on his site that he was a part-time researcher for them. There is an opportunity to ask your first question free on the site - which I did. Here follows the text of my question.

Why?

I was impressed to receive a response within a few minutes. It said that the only logical answer was “why not?” (I can’t provide the original text since I’ve since changed mobile phones).

So far, I’m impressed. But that’s a bit obvious. Time for something a little more challenging, I think.

(more…)



Thursday, December 6, 2007

A (Very Brief) iPhone Review From Someone Who Doesn’t Own One

Filed under: Apple, Communications — Tags: , , , , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 07:54

Well, I got my fingers on the screen of an iPhone yesterday (albeit for less than ten minutes, at my local O2 store) and so here is a very brief review.

The Interface

The interface is simply wonderful. True, I found it fiddly to operate when it was docked and with a security tag in the top-left, but as soon as I took it out of the dock it was wonderful to use. I even managed to do it without triggering the security alarm…

I do, however, have my reservations with the keyboard. In my opinion, you should be able to use it in landscape mode for Email.

The ‘pinch’ gesture is a cinch to get to grips with. Neither does it take too long to master the art of flicking through scrollable lists, pages and artwork in Cover Flow.

The interface is atypical of mobile phone interfaces, because you actually find yourself wanting to use it. No silly submenus, or buttons that are covered in grease after a few minutes of use, just a genius user interface.

Safari

Safari is a joy to use, just like it is on a fully-featured computer. The web sites I visited, such as Google, and this very web site, rendered perfectly. This no surprise really - because Safari on the iPhone is effectively the same as Safari on Windows or the desktop version of OS X, it renders in almost exactly the same way.

Operating system

The iPhone again sets itself apart from other phones in this respect, because it runs an OS which will also run on full featured desktop PCs: the iPhone runs Mac OS X. Put simply, the iPhone is a stripped down Mac computer, with multi-touch replacing the mouse and acting as the keyboard.It runs at a very fast rate, and is most certainly incomparable to any other OS running on mobiles. In fact, while using the phone, I thought to myself, “OS X, Safari and iTunes? This is a phone!

Apps

The apps provided are very impressive, even if the third-party SDK is not surfacing until February. I was particularly impressed to see what looked like either the Genie or the Suck effect (used on Macs as the animation where windows slide into the Dock) used to great effect on the Notes app. I’m still confused, however, as to why these don’t sync with Mac OS X Leopard’s notes. I don’t have Leopard, but several users have reported this, and it seems very odd.

Reservations

After having a little look at the iPhone, I am able to cast a conditional verdict on its problems.

  • I didn’t find the keyboard a problem at all, even though landscape use in Mail would have been nice. I did make a few mistakes, but I think the keyboard would be quite easy to train yourself to after a few days with the machine. I took far less time typing a sentence on the iPhone than I did typing the same sentence on my Motorola.
  • The camera was something of a disappointment. I was expecting something more high-res, and able to capture video as well.
  • EDGE and no 3G - no, no, no, no, no. 3G really needs to be made an option on iPhone Mk II. True, the speed of the connection using Wi-Fi was reasonable, but switching to EDGE made things excruciatingly slow.
  • Flash memory instead of a HDD is a real let-down. The fact that you can only store 8gB on your iPhone is almost an insult.
  • Priority improvement: PAY AS YOU GO. I really can’t afford to shell out £35 a month for a phone. A suitable plan would be a round £350 for the phone, 10p per minute for calls, 5p for outgoing texts, and 50p for unlimited access for 24 hours to The Cloud and EDGE.



Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress 2.7 Comments are the responsibility of their respective author. The Rest © 2007-2009 Jonathan Rothwell, unless otherwise stated.