Crashed Pips - Computers, politics, emetic trash

Saturday, June 28, 2008

Conservapedia.org is parked!

Filed under: Internet — Tags: , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 23:56

Go on. Try it now. It redirects to andyschafly.com (its crackpot creator’s website) which, according to the page, is ‘parked free courtesy of EasyDomain.com’.

“YES!!! There is a God! My faith in humanity has been restored!”

UPDATE: Dammit… I forgot that Crappedia’s main address is conservapedia.com, not .org. DAMN!

UPDATED AGAIN: One has to admire the Consercrapedian’s stupidity: this from the main page on the Henley “bye-election”:

Socialism is crumbling in Britain. On Thursday, the ruling Labour Party candidate came fifth in a parliamentary bye-election - beaten even by the Green Party and the neo-Nazi British National Party (the Conservative Party candidate was a resounding victor). [3]



Friday, June 27, 2008

The Borg is leaving the house

Filed under: Microsoft — Tags: , , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 21:41

So, today was Bill Gates’s last ‘official’ day at Microsoft. He’s now spending the rest of his life giving away his money to deprived people.

However, the departure of Bill Gates is going to be bad for Microsoft. The Beastmaster at least had some idea what businesses and users wanted in the product, and shared some of their frustration with himself; an internal e-mail, dug up by a Seattle newspaper recently, complained to some of his colleagues that he was experiencing extreme difficulty downloading the latest version of Movie Maker. He wasn’t what you’d call an innovator, but he certainly capitalised very well on the demands for programming languages, OSes and office software.

I really can’t think of anything very original to say about Mr. Gates, because his life has been documented down to practically every detail in the media. However, I will say this: Gates’s (sometimes selfish and ruthless) streak has certainly made him one of the most successful businessmen of all time - an amazing achievement for someone who dropped out of college.

Original image by Kees de Vos on Flickr. Used under license.



Sunday, June 22, 2008

Introducing The Sysadmin: A Serialised Story Concerning The Trials And Tribulations Of Life As A System Administrator In A Large Corporation With An Idiotic Manager And A Borgsoft Salesman

Filed under: Humour, The Sysadmin — Tags: , , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 16:51

The Euro 2008 football competition is currently taking up the majority of BBC1’s and ITV1’s television schedules, prompting some soap opera viewers to complain that their favourite soap operas have been moved to compensate. Typically, the Coronation Street cronies and the EastEnders posse can’t (seemingly) go for more than twenty-four hours without seeing someone shouting at somebody else “YOU ARE NOT MY MOTHER!” or “It’s all sawted… innit.”

Watching these letters of complaint being read out on Points of View last week, I wondered what it would be like to have an IT soap opera, for the Slashdot-reading masses of nerds who surf the internet with an army of Sun 3/50s and funny cat pictures (think along the lines of Dr. Blockbuster, whom we first met a few weeks back)?

So, in typical fashion, it is with considerable pleasure that I reveal the world’s first (well, to my knowledge) soap opera aimed at nerds: The Sysadmin. OK, it’s technically a serialised novel with no definite end, but it borrows several concepts from soap operas, including:

  • an overworked, underpaid, handsome protagonist who even hetrosexual men can’t deny secretly fancying
  • a silly, cockish, David Brent-esque baddie
  • the evil outsider (this week, a Borgsoft salesman)
  • reality inflated into surrealism (although more into comedy than melodrama)
  • the ludicrously implausible assaults and deaths, along the lines of people being buried under a concrete slab or murdered by being thrown into a deep freezer
  • et cetera

However, it also adds a ‘nerdy’ spin onto the format, with several characteristics including:

  • the protagonist is a network administrator (not of the evil sort, but of the benevolent sort who works too much and has a manager who’s a bit of a bastard)
  • it obeys the laws of physics (well, mostly)
  • the part numbers are in hexadecimal
  • the whole thing is written in vi

So, without further ado, let’s launch into this week’s edition The Salesman Calls, in which we meet our hero, Jason Richter, his arch-nemesis from Microsoft, Steve Grobmanoff, and Jason’s boss, Mr. Upson of F&U Corporation, who has the intellectual capability of a bag of peanuts. Gasp as the Beastmaster’s minion demands several thousand pounds to stop the network succumbing to Internet threats! Sit in shock as our hero convinces his clueless CEO that he can better the Borg’s offering for a fraction of the cost! Turn red with rage when M$ calls him in the middle of the night to demand money!

OK, enough hype. Here it is. And yes, it was written entirely in vi. It’s best viewed in an external editor, such as TextEdit, vim, gedit, kate, Notepad, etc. Oh, and because I’m feeling kind, it’s cc-by-nc 3.0 licensed.

Eat your heart out, Adam Woodyatt.



Saturday, June 14, 2008

Daily Express: “PAAANIIIIC!!!!”

Filed under: Communications, Politics — Tags: , , , , , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 16:28

So, Shell petrol tanker drivers have started a strike at several fuel depots, demanding a £4,000 pay rise. It’s not been too major. Shell petrol stations have been empty, but there have been plenty of other fuel stations open. The government has advised the public not to panic, or panic buy.

So, in typical fashion, what has the Daily Express to say on this issue?

Just fancy that.

Daily Express front covers copyright Daily Express, 2008.



NeXTStep: The Operating System that Time Forgot

Filed under: Apple, Software, UNIX — Tags: , , , , , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 13:29

Occasionally, one will run into a nerd who’s sufficiently old to remember logging into Usenet, probably from the the Bourne shell on their (massive) UNIX System V workstation. A good indication of whether someone is old enough to remember this is whether or not said nerd has a beard that is at least two inches long and smells strongly of alcohol.

In other cases, you’ll come across the ‘1990s personified’ nerd. He or she will almost always wear a lab coat, glasses, and witnessed the creation of the ‘first post’ phenomenon on Slashdot. He/she is less likely to have a beard.

With this in mind, let me introduce you to Dr. Blockbuster. He’s the nerd of the ‘1990s personified’ form , and fondly recalls the days, in the 1980s, when he, as a post-graduate student at Stanford, would go up to his Sun 3/50 workstation, wait for it to creak into life, and then fire up vi and start coding.

However, consider this. On a cold day in December 1992, he finds the Sun 3/50 will no longer start. In fact, it has coughed, spluttered, and panicked its last. Shock horror! This means Dr. Blockbuster will have to buy a new workstation to do his university dissertations, coding projects and Unix sysadmin procastination.

Not to worry! Dr. Blockbuster’s elderly parents, being the kind people they are, have bought him a new toy. It’s a NeXTstation Turbo Color, created by NeXT, the company Steve Jobs set up after being ‘fired’ from Apple. It’s got 2gB of disk space, 32mB of RAM, a 4096-colour 17-inch display, and a 2.88mB floppy drive. Quite an impressive specification for his day.

However, the most important part of the NeXTstation was its default operating system. It was called NeXTStep, and was perhaps the most important operating system in modern history.

The reason NeXTStep was so important was because of what it managed to do - something that was a completely laughable concept at its time. NeXTStep was Unix. But it wasn’t the kind of Unix Dr. Blockbuster was used to, where one would open up xterm in twm and throw in cat /home/sbbster/libman.c.

NeXTStep’s greatest innovation was to show that an intuitive user interface could work beautifully on Unix, and that it was possible for a consumer-oriented desktop OS to have a core that was traditionally limited to very top-end workstations and servers.

Let’s go back to our fictional scenario. Dr. Blockbuster unboxes his new NeXTstation, and boots the beast for the first time. He selects his language and keyboard layout, enters a username and password, connects it up to the university network, and…

there’s no terminal. There is, instead, something that makes our hero groan. “Oh, God. Another window manager.”

It’s worth putting in context that most Unix window managers of the 1980s were a headache to use. Uwm, the default window manager for X10, didn’t even have titlebars on its windows. Twm was slightly better, but still completely baffling for a standard computer luser. And, worst of all, there was no continuity between these window managers - you either learned a whole new set of key combinations (which would require a combination of opening up the man page and sniffing your way around) or editing the source code to use your old key combos.

However, Dr. Blockbuster decides to spend a little while noodling around NeXTStep before resorting to his trusty System V disks. (Little does he know that System V doesn’t really like NeXT computers.) And - to his astonishment - he works out how to use NeXTStep within ten minutes.

NeXTStep was incredibly intuitive for its time - and even today’s end users, used to start menus, Internet Explorer, and social networks like Spazbook and MyFace, will take less than half an hour to work out how to use NeXTStep. It popularised many of the user interface features and pradigms that have become common today.

Firstly, there was no ‘desktop folder’. You couldn’t stick icons on the desktop, in a similar way to how Windows worked pre-Windows 95. This practice was common among window managers of the 1980s. In a similar vein, one could access the main menu by right-clicking on the Desktop. This was also common practice, so Dr. Blockbuster can work his way around quite easily. It’s quite intuitive.

Then come the more interesting parts of NeXTStep. Its user interface was very aesthetically pleasing for the early 1990s: this is made even more astonishing when you discover that that row of icons on the right is… shock horror… the Dock! Gasp! In the early 1990s? That’s like seeing satellite dishes outside homes in the 1970s (although Life on Mars pretty much took care of that).

The concept of a Dock was very avant-garde for its time. ArthurOS had something similar, the Iconbar, but the Dock was the first truly successful attempt at implementing this organisation method. And it had been done on an OS that was traditionally ‘nerdy’ and difficult to use.

It becomes even more surprising when you notice that windows minimise (or iconify) with a flipping animation - and that the contents of the window follow the frame around when the window is moved. This only appeared in Windows 2000 on Windows systems, and around the same time on Macs (but we’ll come to that later).

Dr. Blockbuster soon found it was easy enough, should he need it, to drop to a UNIX terminal if he needed: all he needed to do was launch Terminal.app. He could even dock the application if he needed to. He e-mail his parents to say thanks in Mail.app, and it was easy enough to start coding instantly by just running vi from the terminal, just like he used to.

It gets better. Instead of the ugly Visual C++ and Visual BASIC languages Microsoft would trumpet in following years, NeXTStep used Objective-C as its native programming language. It also included a WYSIWYG project builder and interface builder, which meant that it took less than ten minutes to build a simple front-end to a SQL database, without even writing a single line of code. Indeed, we have NeXTStep’s excellent programming environment to thank for catalysing Tim Berners-Lee’s development of WorldWideWeb, the first Internet browser/editor (leaving our site).

NeXTStep was ahead of its time. It originally ran only on NeXT’s own computers originally, but was later ported to run on x86, PA-RISC and SPARC architectures. The NeXTstation and NeXTcube were discontinued in 1993, but NeXTStep continued as NeXT’s sole project: in 1995, the last stable release under the NeXTStep name, 3.3, was released. It was, by far, the most popular.

But NeXTStep is far from dead. Indeed, we owe it a lot for proving that Unix could be a user-friendly OS - but it remains, in essence, in one of today’s most popular operating systems.

In 1997, Apple Computer, Inc. bought out NeXT, bringing Steve Jobs back to the company he’d left twelve years ago. With a more benevolent management style and the experience he’d gained from having children and from running NeXT (and his ‘hobby’, Pixar) Jobs guided Apple into continuing the development of NeXTStep. The project to rebuild the Mac OS on the NeXTStep core was called ‘Raphsody’. Apple had tried to create a mass market for Unix in the 1990s with A/UX, but failed magnificently. Now, between 1996 and 1998, Apple continued to work on NeXTStep, rewriting the Mac OS to sit on top of NeXTStep’s BSD core (which would later be called Darwin) and, by 1999, NeXTStep had been turned into the first version of Mac OS X - Mac OS X Server 1.0 (leaving our site).

Server 1.0 is a perfect snapshot of the mutation between NeXTStep and Mac OS X.  Whilst the Platinum interface from Mac OS 9 had been ported over, and the Dock had mysteriously reappeared, most of the applications were NeXTStep’s. NeXTStep’s Workspace Manager covered for the Finder, and, for the first time in the Mac OS’s history, one could drop to a terminal. Yes, a terminal!

Finally, the evolution completed in 2001. NeXTStep started a new life as Mac OS X. The new OS had a rewritten Finder with some concepts borrowed from Workspace Manager, emulation of Mac OS 9 using the ‘Classic’ (or the ‘Blue Box’) environment, and apps, such as Mail and TextEdit, that were direct ports and evolutions of the NeXTStep apps of the same names. The Dock also reappeared, with a new set of squirming and shuffling animations. The old Objective-C programming APIs were carried over from NeXTStep, including the Cocoa APIs that remain in Mac OS X to this day.

However, even though Mac OS X is, by any reasonable definition, NeXTStep, other Unixes, such as Linux, also have a lot to thank NeXTStep for. You see, NeXTStep proved that *nix can be friendly to sysadmins and lusers alike, and also shoved Unix directly in the spotlight. Apple was saved from almost certain doom by the return of Steve Jobs from NeXT, and, in a way, Unix was saved by NeXTStep/Mac OS X. It alerted the end-user to the fact that there was an alternative to Windows, which is why we are seeing the increasing proliferation of desktop Linux distributions.

NeXTStep made such a bold move that people still use it today. The last release was NeXTStep 3.3, which was by far the most popular release of the operating system. Some still use it today. There are even attempts to create a GPLed implementation of the NeXTStep API (leaving our site), and there are several window managers based on NeXTStep’s desktop environment. (My favourite is Window Maker.)

So, in a way, all desktop OSes owe something to NeXTStep. It was an OS that was way ahead of its time, in that it used object-oriented programming from its first release in 1988: this later became the norm for all major desktop operating systems, including Windows. And, perhaps most importantly, NeXTStep was the best desktop Unix that was ever released to run on a PC.

NeXTStep screenshot from nextarchive.net



Wednesday, June 11, 2008

WWDC ‘08 Stevenote Post Mortem

Filed under: Apple, Macintosh — Tags: , , , , , , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 18:40

If you’ll recall, a couple of days ago, I wrote about what I expected would appear at WWDC ‘08. As it transpires, it was a rather surprising event.

  • The iPhone: This made up the bulk of the Stevenote, where Steve Jobs was also (unusually) assisted by Scott Forstall and Phil Schiller. The 2.0 firmware is almost complete and will appear next month - I was surprised it wasn’t complete by now, but I suppose they’re just being careful with a few final sweeps for bugs. The actual revised iPhone wasn’t surprising from a hardware perspective: 3G, lower price, GPS, similar case design… but I was surprised that the case is now almost all plastic instead of all aluminium. The new feature list is somewhat disappointing, although thanks to the iPhone’s nature it shouldn’t be too long to see a change to this. O2 are also going to offer it on a pay-as-you-go tariff, for an unconfirmed price. However, I can’t take much credit for this. The 3G iPhone was the worst-kept secret in history.
  • Mysteriously, the rumoured new MacBooks didn’t appear. This was surprising, although the amount of iPhone stuff they got through probably restricted what else they could get in the keynote.
  • Mac OS X 10.6 was announced - it’s called Snow Leopard, and not Cougar as I expected. I was right in that it’ll concentrate on polish and performance; however, it’s hard to see Apple resisting the temptation to shoehorn a few new features in, including a few aesthetic changes. However, it was only mentioned briefly in the keynote.
  • The Mac Mini and Blu-Ray SuperDrives were not mentioned, which is also quite surprising, particularly for the former. Said machine hasn’t been revised for around a year now, indicating a revamp of the line may be imminent. I suspect both the Mini and new MacBooks (if any) will appear at a similar event to the event the revised iMac appeared last year, so at this rate we could be looking at August.
  • MobileMe (a new synchronisation service which also features .Mac’s old functionalities) wasn’t much of a surprise: it would have been insane for Apple to build in the push PIM, synchronisation, remote kill, etc if it could only be used by enterprises with Microsoft Exchange. I also like the idea of being able to sync my Eee, my iMac, and my phone’s address book, although whether or not it likes Linux is another matter. I suspect it will.

Overall, the Stevenote was something of a disappointment. It was interesting to see what they had to show us, but it concentrated heavily on the iPhone. This is very surprising.



Sunday, June 8, 2008

The Crashed Pips Guide To Irritatingly Implausible Computers In Film: The Core

Filed under: Film — Tags: , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 11:25

The Core is the sort of film where you know, from the start, without doubt, that it has no bloody hope whatsoever. It’s the sort of film where some cocky idiots (probably exaggerating the sizes of their genitals) will do something incredibly predictable and yet physically impossible, get a lot of praise, a lot of money and a lot of sex, and the only half-likeable character will get killed partway through. It’s formulaic film-making at its worst.

Intuitor gave The Core an XP rating. That’s its (albeit terse) way of saying ‘it’s crap’. Now we’ll just look at the computers we see in the film - covered briefly by Intuitor, but we’ll go deeper.

Put simply, at the University of Chicago, some implausibly young and handsome university professor (looking a bit like Duncan James) is giving a lecture about physics - it’s basically jargon, poorly thrown together to form a barely comprehendable sentence. When not spouting poorly-remembered primary school physics, he appears to try chatting up members of the class. He spouts some utter nonsense about sound waves losing frequency when they pass through rock, and then demonstrates this by blowing a trumpet at a piece of limestone.

Somewhat predictably, the students are saved from this boredom as he is plucked out by - yes, you guessed it - US Government agents before he completes the demo, and is whisked off, in a chatered aeroplane, to a mortuary in Washington DC. Where the bodies from thirty-two unexplained deaths are stored. From Boston.

I’m sure the Bostonians understand the need to store bodies before a post-mortem is carried out, so why not put them in Boston? Because, apparently, the thirty-two deaths were hushed up. By the military. Not a single journalist saw it, and not a single person phoned up a news station. Presumably they’ve all been shot to protect federal security.

These people all, miraculously, died within ten blocks of each other. Nice round number, eh? It takes Duncan James (and another scientist he’s met up with, a Russian man called Serge) a couple of seconds and no examination to surmise to the military general, Thomas Purcell, that the deaths were caused by malfunctioning pacemakers caused by some magnetic force in some form. The general takes this (unfounded) explanation without doubt. And dismisses them.

Our Duncan James lookalike is frustrated by the fact that the General is only interested in it not being an actual war, and so withdraws to do some of what all good scientists do. Some detailed analysis.

Meanwhile, we see pigeons getting confused in Trafalgar Square, and crashing into Nelson’s Column, apparently very disorientated. Yeah, right. (Amusingly, a Routemaster bus in London is using an American number plate. Haha. Haha.) I must confess that I did find this scene somewhat hilarious - THE POSESSED PIGEONS OF DOOM!!! Presumably Alfred Hitchcock was right after all.

Prof. Duncan James spitting image (whom, we can discern, is called Dr. Keyes) watches a report on the incident. On “GBTV”. On his computer. In 2002. At nearly 3/4 screen size, in high definition.

This is almost completely implausible. There’s no way a middle-of-the-range worsktation, provided by a university, would be able to play such a video without some choppiness, or loss of quality (MPEG2, anyone?) It would be even less likely that it could be streamed: in my experience, good quality streaming requires at least a 2mb/sec connection to the outside world. The computer also uses angular fonts everywhere, and, somewhat mysteriously, the throbber is still animating in the Internet browser window behind the video (which uses non-standard controls, I might add) - meaning that even more network traffic is being produced by the browser.

Of course, Dr. Keyes imagines that the birds are incapable of navigating by sight over short distances, like Trafalgar Square - and must use their (apparently magnetic) navigation abilities. Therefore - shock horror! The Earth’s magnetic field must be collapsing. He retires to his computer to do some more analysis.

Meanwhile, the Space Shuttle Endeavour starts re-entry - and as soon as the communications blackout ends, it becomes apparent that Endeavour is off course by 129 miles, and heading for Los Angeles. Mysteriously, the Mission Controller’s computer displays this as a dialogue box - dangerously obscuring the map. Surely even NASA wouldn’t be stupid enough to succumb to this basic UI design flaw?

The re-entry sequence is also far too quick. Shuttle re-entry normally takes twelve minutes, at least, not including the glide time. It also confuses me as to why Endeavour’s commander didn’t employ her aerobrake, a parachute, when they had to make an emergency landing in Los Angeles. While it’d be remarkably cool to have a space shuttle land in the middle of LA, it is almost certainly impossible - spacecraft are fitted with remote kill switches, which will, in the event of a major course deviation, blow up the craft, killing those on board if they haven’t ejected or bailed out. It seems almost certain that they’d ask the crew to bail out and then detonate Endeavour just short of LA.

Mysteriously, the NASA machines also display that old cliche, hundreds of scrolling lines of hexadecimal and binary code! Yipee! This, however, is nowhere near as mysterious as how no-one else in the world, apart from Dr. Keyes, has worked out that the Earth’s magnetic field is deteriorating because the core has stopped rotating. Does no-one else in the world own a compass? As Inuitor rightly put it, no Boy Scouts?

So, it’s quite boring for the next bit. Put simply, another scientist, called Zimsky-something, becomes involved, and The Wonderful US Government finally listens. They use some implausible ship, called Virgil, created out of some implausible metal, throwing several billion dollars at it to get it done in three months (rather than ten years). Of course, the ’ship’ will head down to the core of the Earth and get things moving again. In the only way they know how.

Yes, again, when in doubt, throw a nuke at it. Yeah. Right.

Meanwhile, the FBI knock on the door of some Script Kiddie. With a long nose, stupidly high voice, and around three computers. He runs a ‘core purge’ command on all three, presumably wiping the hard disks, sticks his CDs in a toaster and microwave, and then tries to wipe the computers double by running a magnet down the front of the tower.

However, this is highly unlikely. One would have to reboot into an external OS to purge all data on the hard disks. It would be possible to run rm -rf / from within a Unix, but it wouldn’t completely wipe the hard disk. It is also highly unlikely that such a ‘purge’ would complete before the FBI break in - so he completes the job by wiping the hard disks by waving a magnet at them. Even this wouldn’t guarantee complete security though.

Somehow, this Script Kiddie, apparently called ‘Rat’, is placed with the team of Keyes, Zippy and several others (including, yes, a beautiful girl) to help with the mission to get the Earth’s core spinning again. Sadly, he isn’t sent to his almost certain doom at the core of the planet - he’s instead told to stay on the surface. His job is to prevent anyone from precipitating worldwide panic by posing any theories about the series of bizarre events.

Yeah, right. Pigeons have flown into windscreens (very unlikely), people have died mysteriously, Rome has been completely destroyed, the Golden Gate Bridge has collapsed, the Space Shuttle Endeavour has mysteriously crashed in LA, and thunderstorms of unbelievable power have been hitting the planet. How come no news channels have invited analysts to appear, suggesting what might be going on? How come no crackpot fundie on the GOD Channel has claimed that this is the Rapture followed by the Apocalypse? How come no-one has made a link?

Nevertheless, Rat is sent to work. He seemingly does this by - you guessed it - searching the Internet.

The numbskull government launches the craft, at the bottom of the Marianas Trench. It’s all very boring.

Somehow, NASA Mission Control is qualified to run a mission beneath the Earth’s surface. This is completely impossible. The operating environment is completely different, and while it might be possible to have a similar terminal, every single member of staff would have to be retrained.

Even more irritatingly, the terranauts run a ’simulation’ of how the density of the core is less than they’d expected: therefore, the nukes will be useless. However, in typical US military style, evil General Purcell has spent all that money on a nuke, and wants to use it.

So Rat tries to save the team - by, yes, you guessed it, searching the Internet. Apparently, the US Government has special (unsecured) web pages just for this sort of emergency. I mean, there’s no need to write a robots.txt file. No reason for them to put even a simple .htaccess password gate on it. The whole thing strikes me as completely unrealistic.

Rat somehow uses this to divert power from the weapon, meaning that the crew is saved. The film, at this point, became so boring I just switched it off.

However, there is a minor glimmer of hope at the end. Rat hijacks a computer network - and turns it into a spam botnet. It spams hundreds of thousands of E-mail addresses with the news that the ‘terranauts’ have saved the world.

However, this light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of a fast approaching train. Firstly, for some reason, Rat makes the computers on the network display cutesy graphics. Yeah, right. Secondly, Rat, of all people, should know that only real suckers believe everything they see in an E-mail. Presumably that includes the film-makers.

I found the film so boring that I almost can’t be bothered to rate it on the Crashed Pips Irritatingly Implausible IT Classification System. However, after little consideration, I decided that it fits the ‘18′ rating quite nicely. It must have been hallucinated by a drunk student on LSD. In other words… it’s crap. It’s so predictable I didn’t even put a spoiler warning on it.



Saturday, June 7, 2008

iPredict for WWDC…

Filed under: Apple, Communications, Macintosh, iPredictions — Tags: , , , , , , , , — Jonathan Rothwell @ 12:13

The infamous iHype has been steadily growing in anticipation of Steve Jobs’s keynote on Monday at WWDC.

The Macworld offices are, evidently, very busy, with new rumours coming in left, right and centre. And this is not to mention the Apple rumour sites, whose editors must, judging by the number of rumours we’re seeing, be on forty caffiene tablets an hour.

Rumors include a tablet Mac, larger iPhones with 3G and GPS, 14-inch MacBooks with aluminium casing, and all manner of other goodies.

I have slightly different predictions:

  • It is almost certain we will see a 3G iPhone, although I suspect the case design will remain largely unchanged. We’ll see, at most, an all aluminium and glass design - I severely doubt the authenticity of the iPhone with white plastic casing. We’ll see voice dialing, a revised home button which glows different colours when SMSes, MMSes, etc are received, 802.11n, and the actual launch of the 2.0 firmware and the App Store. O2 will also offer the iPhone on a pay-as-you-go plan in the UK, charging 11p a minute for each call and SMS, and offering free Internet access (3G, GPRS, EDGE and Wi-Fi with The Cloud).
  • I suspect we may see new MacBooks and MacBook Pros next week. Both devices will be made completely out of aluminium, and the MacBook Pro will take on a more ‘brushed metal’ appearance, similar to the iMac. The MacBook will have a black surround around the screen, also similar to the iMac.
  • The first features of Mac OS X 10.6 will be revealed. It’ll be called Cougar, and will focus heavily on polish and reliability. One of the most immediately obvious features is Fairy Dust, a new set of graphical transitions that occur when a window is minimised, an icon is undocked, etc. This will mean that the Genie effect is revised, and now causes the window to ’sink’ as well as warp into the Dock, and that when the Trash is emptied, the Trashcan will glow and the items inside will appear to explode. Cougar will also include a new Terminal, which allows users to switch, using a menu, between the Bourne shell, the Korn shell, bash, dash, csh, tcsh, and a new, Apple designed shell called crash (Completely Redesigned Apple SHell). It’ll also have native support for ZFS and ext2/3/4. The new graphical enhancements will give Cougar the slogan ‘everything that happens is a blockbuster’, and therefore the new intro movie will reflect that fact, flying around a maze of historic Macintosh models while Ed Welch’s theme tune to Blockbusters plays in the background - additionally, the new intro movie will reveal that OS X has finally been translated into Welsh.
  • ‘One More Thing’ will be a new revision of the Mac Mini. It will include an all aluminium design, and will also have FireWire 800 on board, 802.11n, a SuperDrive, keyboard and mouse as standard, and a $200 discount off a 20″ Cinema Display.
  • There will be one more iddy-biddy thing: there’ll be Blu-Ray SuperDrives for Macs, which can be ordered separately and installed by hand, or added as a build configuration option for an extra $300-ish.
Even if I am entirely wrong, it’ll be very interesting to see what is revealed on Monday. Now I just need to work out what time the keynote starts, and what time it’ll be in London when that happens.



Powered by WordPress 2.7 Comments the responsibility of their respective author. The Rest © 2007-8 Jonathan Rothwell, unless otherwise stated.