I’ve been following the ultrasub-notebook market very closely of late. Eee PCs (and MacBook Airs) have been selling like hotcakes, whilst other manufacturers have somewhat failed to penetrate the market.

However, I’ve just come across the HP Mini-Note. (True, that’s a rubbish name, but it’s better than “Eee PC”, or, worse still, “G-DIUM” - what were they on when they thought of that?) And, I have to say, it looks to be a very promising little machine.

GNOME is, as I have said before, my desktop environment of choice on most computers. This is partly because of its simplicity and elegance, and partly because… well… I hate KDE. And I am referencing this previous article because in the article I said that the three major choices were to “use GNOME, KDE, or cobble something together out of the other major window managers and desktop environments”. I owe an apology here to Xfce, which I failed to mention in this article.

My Xfce4 desktop, with Xfce terminal open.

My Xfce4 desktop, with Xfce terminal open.

My relationship with Xfce (not XFCE - this acronym came from “XForms common environment”, which is invalid as XForms is no longer used) has been somewhat love/hate. I always liked the fact that Xfce was GNOME-like in its implementation but yet lightweight, but I was irritated by its lack of polish and the fact that most of my time was spent at the command line, configuring.

However, I recently decided I should give another desktop environment a try on my Eee PC. I tried KDE4 - it was a disaster, nothing less. It was slow, chunky, and uuu-gly.

Mysteriously, even after purging all the KDE packages and running  apt-get clean, I was left with less disk space than before. ~100mB may not seem like much for someone using a massive HDD with 300-odd gigabytes of space - but to me, with my Eee’s puny 4G hard drive, it is important to conserve as much space as possible.

Naturally, after this, I tried Xfce. It’s very similar to GNOME in appearance and function, and comes with the lovely Thunar file management program. Mousepad, its text editor, is also very nice, and it’s also GTK+ 2.0 based, meaning the apps I use on GNOME look very similar on Xfce.

I still have some problems with Xfce: its typing breaks application doesn’t take into account idle periods, and I don’t like the fact that it’s difficult to enable compiz. However, I can get around these: Xfce has improved quite a bit since I last used it on eeeXubuntu, and I rather like the elements of the desktop I’ve configured:

  • The wallpaper is Sydney Harbour Bridge WP from here on Deviantart.
  • The xfwm and GTK themes are Next - I can’t find a link for these, they’re probably floating around on freshmeat somewhere.
  • The font is FreeSans at a 9pt font size.
  • The icon set is GNOME 2 - the file manager-related icons were actually drawn by Susan Kare, the lady responsible for the Macintosh icons (pre-OS X). Her design philosophy renders icons as more like road signs than illustrations, and they are quietly beautiful in the environment.
  • The panel currently has a menu, a window picker, a hard disk and sound monitor, a typing break monitor, a workspace pager, a system tray and a clock.

Spam is one of those things that’s often so bad, it’s good. Today, I received one of those messages. It was sent to the hello@crashedpips.co.uk e-mail address (obviously harvested, from here) and I present the text below:

Dear customers,
Thank you for using our new service “Buy airplane ticket Online” on our website.
Your account has been created:

Your login: hello@crashedpips.co.uk
Your password: passRHK6

Your credit card has been charged for $669.57.
We would like to remind you that whenever you order tickets on our website you get a discount of 10%!
Attached to this message is the purchase Invoice and the flight ticket.
To use your ticket, simply print it on a color printed, and you are set to take off for the journey!

Kind regards,
Spirit Airlines

There are multiple reasons why this is dubious.

  1. I never booked a flight, and the idea I would do so with Spirit Airlines is ludicrous. Because they operate in the Americas as an ultracheap airline (a bit like EasyJet in the UK, but without as much orange.)
  2. As Spirit is an ultracheap airline, $669 (even with the current state of the dollar) is excessive.
  3. Printer is mis-spelled printed. It seems unlikely that a medium-size airline (still quite a large operation) would make such a mistake - can they not afford a dictionary?
  4. The ‘invoice’ and ‘flight ticket’ are attached in a ZIP file, apparently. Examination of the zip file reveals - yes, you guessed it - Ticket_N141-SK.exe, which looks suspiciously like a virus. I’ll be sending this off to some antivirus companies for analysis.
  5. They’ve obviously put in no effort with header spoofing whatsoever: the ‘from’ address is kvtgady (at] bradshawplace (full stop) com (address obfuscated to prevent spam to the (possibly) innocent owner of this address).
  6. Yep, the usual “Dear Customers” opening line (surprise, surprise).
  7. This is perhaps the most important point of all. It demolishes the e-mail’s premise in one swipe: I don’t even have a damn credit card. Even if I did, I’d have paid in pounds or euros, rather than dollars. If I did have to pay in dollars, I would have sent the money using a money transfer service or simply by popping a cheque in the post.

For the record, I’ve tried to contact Spirit about this, but the only phone numbers I can find are for their reservations centre, and the only e-mail addresses I can find are for comments on the Web site. If anyone can source a number or address direct to Spirit’s HQ, I’d be very grateful - it’s best the airline knows about this so it can post an advisory in its website.

EDIT: I’ve sent the file to McAfee and its online scanner says it’s spy-agent.bw. An extra .dat file is being issued for this - I’ll see what McAfee’s rules on redistribution are, and if it’s OK with them I might mirror it here for if you’re using a McAfee scanner. Meanwhile, Symantec won’t let me show them the virus unless I pay them money, and Sophos’s process is long and irritating.

The file will now be shredded to protect other machines on my network.